Empirical Results

Measured results for the neural methods. The theory behind these methods is in the theory section.

Architecture-specific results

Each page focuses on finding the optimal network size/shape for each problem within a single architecture. Numbers are single-seed and indicative, not a rigorous hyperparameter optimum.

ArchitecturePageNetwork
Deep BSDEdeep_bsde.md\(Z\) (and \(\Gamma\)) nets
Deep HJB (DGM)dgm.mdvalue net
Neural operatoroperator.mdbranch/trunk (DeepONet) or spectral (FNO)

Cross-architecture results

PageContents
ResultsValidation, activation comparison, reference agreement
ComparisonTraining/execution time and error vs exact, split PDE/SOC
CoverageWhich architecture fits each exact-solution problem

Problems considered

ProblemClassExact solutionMath background
Black-Scholes European callPDEclosed formBSDE/DGM theory; PDE exact (Black-Scholes)
Merton log-utility portfolioSOCclosed formSOC exact (Merton portfolio)
Linear-quadratic regulatorSOCclosed form (Riccati)SOC exact (LQ regulator)
Jump linear-quadratic regulatorSOC (jump)closed form (Riccati/affine)SOC exact (LQ with jumps); jump theory
Avellaneda-Stoikov market makingSOCclosed form (matrix exponential)SOC exact (Avellaneda-Stoikov)
Merton jump portfolioSOC (jump)closed formSOC exact (Merton with deterministic jumps)
Merton jump log-normalSOC (jump)numerical rootSOC exact (Merton with log-normal jumps)

The no-closed-form cases (Heston, Hawkes, correlated-default L3, unequal-\(k\) market making) are not yet in neural_solver; they are the target of the neural-operator stage and are documented in the neural operator theory.